Let’s imagine that one of your most knowledgeable, trustworthy friends came up to you and said: “I just read a bunch of reputable research that said eating vegetables isn’t healthy. In fact, these studies say that broccoli and carrots are harmful and we need to eat more chocolate!” Even if your friend showed you the studies, the graphs, the testimonials from former veggie-lovers who had seen the light; you’d probably still believe vegetables are healthy. After all, if you could have been eating chocolate all this time, why did you waste years on salads? In fact, you’d be likely to dig in your heels and chomp on even more veggies than before. This is because, when we are devoted to a certain truth, we tend to ignore contradictory evidence and seek out confirming evidence. We become more committed to our beliefs, which is known as confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is why arguing with your grandma about politics is futile, even when you have the facts on your side. Sometimes, though, confirmation bias can have higher stakes than hurt feelings at granny’s. When evidence tells us that we should rethink our teaching practices, we educators can be more stubborn than your Uncle Leo repeating talking points he got from Sean Hannity. Even if -- especially if -- evidence might suggest we could have been doing better for our students all along, we’ll argue that what we’ve been doing is “best practice.” I’ve been thinking about the difficulty of changing practice a lot lately, because the past few weeks have seen a series of earthquakes in the literacy-teaching world. With the release of Natalie Wexler’s book, The Knowledge Gap, and Emily Hanford’s audio documentary, At a Loss For Words, it could feel like everything we’ve been taught about teaching reading is wrong. That’s when our confirmation bias protects us by screaming that we should go read something that supports our past practices. After all, change is hard. It might not be favored by our bosses, might need resources or knowledge we don’t have. But the deepest reason not to change? It feels terrible to think we could have been doing better by the students in our charge. But if we’re truly committed to providing the best education possible, we have to change as we learn. A the saying goes, “know better, do better.” So, how do we overcome our confirmation bias? How do we start to change, even when it hurts? Below, I share a few tips that have helped me and others (with a few insights into my own biases and mistakes along the way). 1. Seek out perspectives other than your own. Brooke Gladstone, of NPR, puts it this way: “You have to vary your media diet a little bit, like read something that you just wouldn’t be inclined to read.... And keep taking in their perspective. It’s incredibly helpful to just know what’s going on in the world.” This process, she admits, can be painful. However, it can be necessary in expanding our awareness. For years, I admit I’ve had a bias against private school vouchers. Studies have shown that my bias was reasonable. However, listening to parent education advocates explain the reasons they want vouchers has made me more aware of my bias and more open to considering other perspectives. 2. Take a cue from Marie Kondo. De-cluttering expert Marie Kondo suggests that it can help us let go of unwanted clutter by thanking items before we discard them. When it’s time to let go of teaching practices we’ve learned are less effective, we can be grateful for their utility when they were the best we knew. Reading Wexler’s book, there have been several times when she has presented research that counters something I did in my own classroom (or even -- yikes! -- shared with other teachers as good practice.) Yes, it can make me feel guilty. I move past that by telling myself: “It was the most effective thing I knew to do at the time, and now I can do something even more effective.” Staying in the guilt of our past doesn’t help our students, nor does ignoring new evidence. 3. Change your thought pattern. Cognitive therapists help people overcome challenges by reframing their self-talk. Making small changes in the way you think can change your practices in big ways. For example, although I’m a believer in phonics, when I became exasperated with a student’s attempts to sound out a word, I would sometimes ask them to look at the picture to figure out the word -- even though I had learned this was ineffective, even counter-productive. So I changed my thinking with a short phrase. Whenever I was tempted to encourage a student to guess, I said to myself, “We don’t guess. We say the sounds.” By picking a short, positively-framed phrase I could repeat to remind myself of the change I wanted to make, I altered my self-concept to that of someone who wouldn’t resort to a shortcut. Change can be painful, and our brains want to protect us from that pain with confirmation bias. For our students, however, shifting our thinking is critical to helping them succeed.
13 Comments
Cher McManus
8/28/2019 07:24:58 am
Thank you, this helps mitigate the resistance we inevitably feel.
Reply
This is really true of people who are married to phonics: they are constantly involved in confirming their own biases. Emily Hanford's series has been really popular among people who already are committed to teaching phonics. Phonics proponents do all the same things that they accuse whole-languagists of: designing studies poorly; refusing to accept evidence that contradicts their viewpoints; tweeting articles they haven't even read. I see that all the time. Dr. Jeff Bowers, who has published meta-analyses of the pro-phonics research, found it nearly impossible to get his research published, because pro-phonics reviewers deliberately misunderstood him.
Reply
LiteracyFriend
9/3/2019 06:46:16 am
I did as you asked and read Dr. Bowers’ article. (I’m assuming you’re referring to his ). It is an interesting read on the importance of including morphological analysis in teaching children to read. In his view, phonics is not enough, and we should encourage even MORE word analysis (at the morpheme level.) Many phonics proponents would agree with this. This is *not* a step away from phonics and toward whole language; it moves the other direction— further than just phonics to allow students to see the morphophonemic qualities of the English spelling system. Again, many phonics proponents would welcome this addition (and currently recommend using it.) It’s important to note that Dr. Bowers doesn’t reject the needs for phonics. In his article he states: “A central tenet of SWI is that children need to study the interrelation between morphology, etymology, and phonology in order to understand the writing system.”
Reply
LiteracyFriend
9/3/2019 06:52:41 am
I forgot to add the name of the article I read in my previous post. Sorry- trying to compose on a phone... My post should have read, “I assume you are referring to his article, ‘Beyond Phonics: The Case for Teaching Children the Logic of the English Spelling System.’”
WR X LC = RC
9/3/2019 05:43:53 pm
Are you familiar with the Simple View of Reading or Scarborough's Rope? These are important anchors for understanding the components of reading comprehension. Phonics proponents understand the place of phonics, and just as important, phonological awareness, to the outcome of reading comprehension. It is also important to understand that much of the media attention on phonics is simply a recognition that this critical component of fluent reading is also the one for which the largest gap in teacher knowledge exists. LETRS (Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling) is stellar professional development for those seeking to understand the science of reading.
Reply
Caitlin
9/10/2019 04:47:19 pm
Lex, I was not a proponent of phonics. I started teaching in the early 90s. Way more whole language. That’s why the APM Educate pieces from 2018 and 2019 by Emily Hanford blew my mind. I feel like your comment is the reverse.
Reply
Deb
9/12/2019 02:34:37 pm
I'm so glad you said this, Caitlin. I think the whole phonics phenom. is raising teachers' hackles because on the surface it can sound like THE only thing we need to do to teach reading effectively is to teach phonics. When, in fact, there are many layers. And, has been pointed out in many articles by many reading scientists and teachers, comprehension is the goal - always. In my 20+ years of teaching reading I, too, spent many of those using the three cueing system. What I find with phonics is that a teacher has to be pretty creative to make it palatable for some children. and its assumed dryness may be a turn off for some. For example, my own son, a precocious reader, would have been completely bored with a strictly phonics approach to reading because he already had broken the code. And here is where assessment and differentiation are important. Not every child needs the same level of phonics instruction. Some may be ready for morphological lessons (roots, bases, and affixes), for example, as the next step in decoding more difficult unfamiliar words and building vocabulary. But back to my point. As was said, while phonics is necessary to teach many students how to read, it must not be taught until phonological awareness is strong. And in addition to phonics, I believe cross checking is still very important in the name of comprehension. I had many students rely so heavily on phonics that they stopped paying attention to meaning and didn't even notice when what they read made no sense. So, let's please keep everything in mind (i.e. ALL of the components of reading) when discussing phonics so that teachers for whom this may be new (or disagreeable) thinking can think about it in light of every other aspect of reading we must teach at the same time. We don't teach children how to read in a vacuum of phonics. We still need to teach concepts of print, alphabetic principle, phonological/phonemic awareness, vocabulary , fluency, and comprehension. And phonics.
Nancy Barth
8/30/2019 08:50:58 am
Change happened little by little for me and it happened when I respected those who suggested changes and when those people made suggestions in a positive way.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Click the categories below for entries on specific topics.
AuthorCatlin Goodrow, M.A.T Archives
December 2022
Categories
All
|